Why
must LR-26-CA pass?
v In Nebraska, 18 is old enough to vote, be
drafted, serve in the military, and have access to tobacco, yet these young citizens
are labeled as too immature or inexperienced to run for certain offices.
v If 18 is mature enough to kill whilst serving
in the military, then 18 is old enough to legislate.
v The right to decide who can hold public
office should belong to the voters.
v This will encourage greater youth
participation in politics.
v There has been a strong global precedent over
the last few decades to reduce the voting age in Austria, the United Kingdom,
and other countries. These changes, often brought on by youth, display a desire
and willingness to engage and fulfill the duties of voting and serving in a public office.
Everyone should have a place in American Democracy,
and that includes holding public office. The legislature should be supporting
and encouraging people of all ages to take part in government by voting yes on LR-26-CA!
What is your stance on this bill? Should everyone
of legal voting age be allowed to serve in any Nebraska public office? Should
the Nebraska people as a whole decide? Post your comments below!
~James Moseman
~James Moseman
This post reflects the view of the Nebraska Governor's Youth
Advisory Council members and may not reflect the view of Governor Ricketts.
Please contact the Governor's office for his official stance.
We already have an example of someone who is too immature to be in office by proposing legislation like this with all other more important issues needing to be addressed. This bill is a waste of time and should be withdrawn.
ReplyDelete